Re: Chubb combination lock fail
MartinHewitt wrote:Amplify around 22.5 with w1/w2 still parked at 85. I do it with halve steps, i.e. 20, 21.25, 22.5, 23.75, 25.
Is it really necessary? I mean, this is a creative way to take 5 readings instead of 6, but do we need it?
I prefer to take readings every increment, in this case 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. It avoids confusion and takes me a few seconds more.
And, even if I have some experience with manipulation, I take all the readings again. Remember that consistency is key here.
No hard feelings here, I'm just thinking out loud.
Cheers
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)