Sat Jun 27, 2015 8:06 pm by capt-dunc
ok i've got 3 replies:
for femurat, i've run AWL 1 number at a time
for jharveee, i've done w1&2 10R, W3AL
for mecuial...
i've re checked the original graph at 25, 45, 65, 85 dialing from the front and looking at the contact, and dialing blind looking at the cam, then taking the reading after. i'd chosen these points since they are around the spread of the wheel and they are 2 narrow and 2 wide points on the the graph. all the results were as above. you made me doubt myself, and that is good, but, i know why the results are as they are, and are correct as results.
the follow on graphs that i've done following femurat and jarvheee's suggestions back up the intial readings as being correct as well.
SO, A QUESTION FOR THE PRO's... can you see why the graph is correct, whilst considering what mecurial's said about L & R indications? (it's something that i'd not seen writen or considered, but is correct scientifically).
i'll post the new graphs tomorrow, but leave it a couple of days to look at why mecurial may be wrong. all the information for that, is above in this thread.
i look forward to the replies, and the mecurial reading problem, was a new form of questioning. new graphs torommow and we'll all face the next challange.
dunc x