Well if I am going to be threatened with being banned for speaking my mind then I would at the least like a right of reply.
MBI wrote:Piotr, I believe your accusations have crossed a line.
You are looking at lp101 from a perspective that is largely from the outside.
Based on that perspective, you seem to be assuming a certain intent on the part of those who use and run the site.
I believe your assumption to be largely incorrect.
"[L]argely" but not
entirely incorrect, i.e. you are implicitly conceding that there is an element of truth to my posts.
MBI wrote:I can tell you from that inside perspective, that I see no evidence in the moderator forum or any of the phpbb logs of any coverup in regards to Schuyler and his Kickstarter. There are no deleted threads, no gag orders.
It was never my intention to state or even imply that there was an active conspiracy in place. Further, there need not be for the sake of the truth of my central claims. The culture of lp101 was established in the first year of that forum's operation (and I have been following it since then) and since that time every action of moderation and administration has been -- more or less -- in effect to defend and reproduce that culture (which was established by the owner). Many of the people that contributed to the jaundiced culture of lp101 are not even active any more but their spirit continues in the behaviour and attitude of moderators, administrators and longtime members. Hence my continued use of the terms
culture in relation to lp101.
MBI wrote:It's a giant black mark on a group of people who are already viewed askance by society at large.
Indeed and since lp101 was Towne's main platform the management of lp101 should take a formal position on him. At the least, Towne should have his membership status set to "untrustworthy"/"disreputable" or whatever the appropriate lp101 designation of that happens to be.
MBI wrote:As far as I can recall, there has been no public statement on lp101 disavowing Schuyler and his Kickstarter.
Just as if you had a close relative who had been accused or convicted of some heinous crime, I imagine you'd be embarrassed about it too, and probably avoid the subject.
I don't think that is good enough. When Towne crawls back out from under the rock that he is currently hiding under, amongst the first places he will return to is lp101 to test the water. The option for lp101 management will then be the same as the which Romstar presented after his first round of fucking over members. Why not pre-empt that move and prevent any further exploitation of the community? This would certainly demonstrate the good-faith that you are suggesting exists.
MBI wrote:Like it or not, there will always be fans who will defend Schuyler and his intentions, but I don't believe it's an organized coverup.
Indeed, and that is why people like me and the others that have criticised Towne should be free to express their opinion.
Allowing only posts that praise Towne and threatening punishment of anyone that makes a critical post is tantamount to propaganda.
MacGyver101 wrote:Just my $0.02, but I'm tired of seeing every thread that could possibly be related to LP101 in some vague way turned into a bunch of unprovoked, vitriol-filled posts and personal attacks from one particular member here.
Then just don't read my posts. Better yet why not just stay at lp101 and add to your voluminous posting history there. You have 136 posts on keypicking.com and I reviewed all of them. Most of them are one or two line "affirmatory" posts. None as far as I can see contain substantive content. Where the post isn't merely the expression of an affirmation or a negation it is typically vestigial. That is to say, you have virtually no effort invested in this forum yet you see fit to try and influence its content and policy.
elbowmacaroni wrote:Wow... wow... wow...
Holy shit even... Piotr calm down bro. It's pointless at this juncture to keep the topic of Shyster Towne alive, everyone knows what happened.
No it isn't pointless. There will come a time when Towne will seek to re-launch himself and it is important that there be a clear record and analysis of his malfeasance. Unless you are suggesting that Schuyler be given two rounds to exploit the community like Romstar did on lp101 then Towne's dirty deeds should be mentioned at every opportunity.
elbowmacaroni wrote:Piotr, you've been around here for a while now and you're a decent guy, but if you keep going on tirades about this, and especially about lp101 and some conspiracy and attacking people there or here personally, then we will have to take some kind of action to be determined upon such an event occurring.
As I've already tried to explain I neither stated nor even meant to imply that there was some active conspiracy. If I were to characterise the problem (as I see it) in terms of conspiracy, it would be a conspiracy of acquiescence.
abroxis wrote:As much as his Kickstarter screwup blackened the image of locksports I believe that the vitriolic attacks and exaggerations show too many members of the locksport community to be mean spirited petty assholes.
If you are genuinely concerned with the image of "locksport" then you should welcome the hostility towards Towne (and Romstar). The hostility and vitriol is a demonstration of the recognition of a moral transgression. What would profoundly worry me is acquiesence and the acquiesence on lp101 is indeed disturbing.
Many feel that Towne's celebrity and popularity is illegitimate, that he is not a talented lockpicker and that his reputation is largely the result of luck rather than any real talent. Those that are more talented than Towne that remain in obscurity will naturally feel this way. The closest analogy that comes to mind is corporate career where the genuinely talented is overlooked for a promotion that goes to the office sycophant. I believe that captures the sentiment of the senior members that have ridiculed and castigated Towne. Note that this opinion will only ever be expressed here -- even though it is fair comment and couldn't in anyway be construed as defamaory -- because of the culture that pervades lp101. It is instructive to ask "why is that so?" I would suggest that it is not permitted on lp101 to state that the emperor has no clothes. This injunction doesn't take the form of an explicit directive. Rather it is suggested, hinted at and implied. That is to say, it is a cultural feature of lp101.