FAQ  •  Register  •  Login
UKLockpickers.co.uk Lockpicking supplies such as Lockpicks, tools, and more! COMMANDOLOCK.COM Military grade padlock systems lockpickshop.com A source for lockpicking supplies such as lockpicks, locksmith tools, and more!

LocksportSouth's Stash

<<

nine4t4

User avatar

Familiar Face

Posts: 51

Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:48 pm

Location: Toronto

Post Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:28 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Nice selection. I'm gonna have to dump money again for some locks. The problem is finding the right level of challenge for my ability. Somewhere above "Swearing" but below "Soul Crushing". Medeco or something like that Garant may be the next purchase. Pricey but it'll keep me occupied much longer than the stuff I have bought.
JOB: (n.) a series of tasks that aren't enjoyable, but are done in return for money. see Prostitution
A LIVING: (n.) A means of enjoying ones existence that also provides financial compensation. see Freedom
<<

LocksportSouth

User avatar

Active Member

Posts: 369

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:51 pm

Location: UK

Post Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:51 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Thanks! The Garant would definitely be a challenge, probably higher than the Medeco since you have all those sidebar sliders. That's like 16 pins of which 10 don't have any kind of spring tension or feedback... Medecos are a well known toughie (unless you're Marc Tobias, lol) too so you'd be in good company there. If you can get opening Medecos down pat you'll be set up for a good job opening everyone's S&Gs that they buy on eBay without keys :D.
<<

LocksportSouth

User avatar

Active Member

Posts: 369

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:51 pm

Location: UK

Post Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

And consider this a “part two” of S&G Combo locks:

Image

This time we have am 8077AD to take a look at. I did actually have an 8077 arrive too, but sadly the combination was missing so I sold it on, however if you want to take a look at the photos for that one, I have some Here.

However, let’s get back to the AD!
It comes with its original box and is in great condition:

Image

Image

Image

It does come with the original instructions as far as I can tell (Unlike the previous 8077A which came with reprinted instructions), as well as the change key:

Image

Image

You’ll notice it has a black dial rather than green:

Image

That’s characteristic of the AC and AD variants, whereas the A and AB have a green dial. The 8077 has a totally different back and backplate-retaining method but within the A, AB, AC and AD I’m not sure what the differences are outside of the different dial. I assume it’s mostly inside stuff. If and when I collect the 8077 and the AC I will be doing a comparison series between them all – those two locks, especially the AC have evaded my capture thus far :).

Image

Unique ID stamped into the front body part:

Image

The shackle:

Image

And the rear too:

Image

The dial even seems to say “60” on it – not sure if that’s a unique ID as well but I’m willing to bet that it is:

Image

Backplate fitting strategy for this lock:

Image

Image
Inside of the back plate (which also seems to have another unique ID, “2” stamped here).

Image

Back of the lock with the plate removed. Looking a little rusty oddly:

Image

Changing code:

Image

Unlocked and ready to go:

Image
<<

LocksportSouth

User avatar

Active Member

Posts: 369

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:51 pm

Location: UK

Post Thu Apr 21, 2016 8:25 am

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

To round off this little flurry of updates, I have something pretty cool for you:

Image

A white cardbox box! :D
Kidding!

Image

It’s an Abloy 656! These aren’t as easy to come by as most Abloys because they were made, as far as I’m aware, only for Military purposes (or at least, they are now discontinued). The key is a kind of High Profile Abloy style but seems to use a specific shape which I assume is restricted for military purposes. IIRC the 656 can come in both the classic silvery finish or with a brass finish, although I believe they’re all brass bodied locks, not stainless steel.

Let’s take a look at the instruction sheet, which makes me laugh:

Image

Simplified: “Insert key. Turn. Lock opens” :D.

Back of the key – looks similar to any Classic, Profile or High Profile from here except for the UID stamped onto the key:

Image

The key bow is stamped with “US GOVT PROPERTY DO NOT DUP”:

Image

Key front:

Image

Image

Now let’s move on to the body:

Image

We can see that as well as the usual ABLOY and model number stamps, we also have “US 1998 B”, so that’s cool.

Image

Keyway:

Image

Image

You’ll notice the bottom plug doesn’t have the same screw cutout as most Abloys. That’s because this lock works slightly differently – rather than the core being “loose”, protected behind a screw-in bottom plug, which itself it held in by a set screw, in the 656 the entire core is protected inside a brass housing which slots directly into the bottom of the lock and is held in place by a set screw into the side of the housing. I assume this is to make it easier for the military to drop out and drop in replacement cores quickly, contained within their own modules, rather than having to fiddle with taking the individual parts out.

Front again:

Image

Top:

Image

Locked:

Image

Unlocked:

Image

Open:

Image

That’s one greasy shackle!

Image

Now, not only was the shackle very greasy (it had been intentionally lubed up, but with WAY too much lube and it’s a nasty, sticky stuff, clearly not a decent lube) but the key itself was very stiff and the mechanism felt very gummed up so I decided to open it up and take a look...

The screw for removing the cylinder holder is the same as most Abloys:

Image

Although the screw is slightly different, with a flat end:

Image

Image

Pop in the key...

Image

And slide out the cylinder:

Image

The actuator in the bottom of the lock:

Image

Whilst I never photographed that part, I also removed the actuator and ball bearings and cleaned all the parts off, as well as the inside of the body itself, with WD-40 and some elbow grease before re-lubing with a light application of Silicone grease. Feels much nicer now!

And here’s the cylinder holder again:

Image

The hole in the side is where the side set screw fits. The flat end of the screw is to stop the lock cylinder, which you can see the outside of inside the hole, from scraping on the screw. The cylinder holder goes together in an interesting way – here’s the back:

Image

There’s a brass C-Clip type ring in there, which you can just about see, which holds the plug into the outer cylinder. The clip is bent to an angle and is removed by turning it around to line up with a slope on the outer edge of the outer cylinder and “unscrewing” it

Image

Image

With the clip removed, the inner lock cylinder will now slide out backwards. You’ll need to remove the key first!

Image

Image

Yeesh! What is that green powdery stuff? It looks like Wasabi, and I found it not just inside the cylinder but inside the lock body as well. All I can imagine is that it’s oxidised copper/brass which has reacted to the lube or moisture – either way, it’s responsible for making the cylinder all sticky and nasty.

Sidebar:

Image

Cylinder again; you can see the individual locking disks as well as copper spacer disks. Cool stuff:

Image

Image

Now, I’ve not disassembled an Abloy before for fear of screwing it up, but I couldn’t let this travesty stand, and so....

Image

Eep! That’s a lot of disks. Most are discoloured and “rusty” in some way, I wish there were a way to restore them somewhat rather than just cleaning and re-lubing them but this is all I know for now. I did give them all a good spray down with WD-40 and a buff off with a microfiber cloth.

Here’s the disk holder (this is the inner cylinder), which I also cleaned down:

Image

Clean disks!

Image

The gap between “disks laid out” and “Cylinder working again” was a bit of a long one. I re-assembled it fine:

Image

But then realised that some disks, when the key is inserted and turned, did not reveal their sidebar cutout. I must have gotten some of the locking disks inserted back to front! I’m not sure if there’s any way to know for sure which way around the disks should go (or the spacers for that matter), but I solved it in the end up re-assembling and inserting the key after every disk to check that the sidebar cutouts all lined up. T’was a bit of a task!

Finally working!

Image

Re-assembled and ready to drop back in:

Image

At this point I also worked through a small squirt of Tri-flow into the disk cylinder to keep them lubed (I have heard that a little vasaline is better but don’t have any of that; Tri-flow seems to work ok at the moment. As the lock won’t be in regular heavy use I’m hoping it’ll be ok!) and also cleaned out the rest of the body and re-lubed the parts with silicone grease.

All re-assembled:

Image

And we’re done! Thanks for reading :)
<<

huxleypig

User avatar

The Prestigious and Powerful Porcine Prelate

Posts: 954

Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:59 am

Location: West Mids, UK

Post Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:41 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Great work LSS! This has been most useful for having a look at some more Abloy HP profiles. I was most interested to note the profile on the 656 - it has a more central 'lump' than other I have seen. I still think it would fall into the "right lump" profile group though. Noting that it has 14 discs in total (if you count the fixed-thick-spacer as a disc). There are apparently several 'secret' profiles that exist. I have seen an "anti-impression" profile that was quite strange but it did not stop the lock from being picked.

It is also interesting to note that it is master keyed, has no middle profile disc (many HP padlocks I have seen have one around the middle of the pack) and also that it has a comparatively high number of anti-pick discs; 5 in total. The most I have seen before is 4 in any one lock, although normally it is between 1 - 3.
<<

LocksportSouth

User avatar

Active Member

Posts: 369

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:51 pm

Location: UK

Post Thu Apr 21, 2016 3:50 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

huxleypig wrote:Great work LSS! This has been most useful for having a look at some more Abloy HP profiles. I was most interested to note the profile on the 656 - it has a more central 'lump' than other I have seen. I still think it would fall into the "right lump" profile group though. Noting that it has 14 discs in total (if you count the fixed-thick-spacer as a disc). There are apparently several 'secret' profiles that exist. I have seen an "anti-impression" profile that was quite strange but it did not stop the lock from being picked.

It is also interesting to note that it is master keyed, has no middle profile disc (many HP padlocks I have seen have one around the middle of the pack) and also that it has a comparatively high number of anti-pick discs; 5 in total. The most I have seen before is 4 in any one lock, although normally it is between 1 - 3.


Thanks!

You know a lot more about the different profiles than me! But yeah, I've read somewhere that the High Profile system was created, in part, to allow for a greater number of differs but also to allow for a greater number of profile variations to include some restricted military profiles. Given that the 656 was only created (AfAIK) for military purposes I can imagine that this one is using a slightly different profile from all the others.

Could you tell me how you know that this lock is master-keyed? I can't tell from the discs so I'd love if you could share your knowledge here. I assume the anti-pick disks are the ones with false notches / gates in the outer portion of the disks. I haven't disassembled any of my Protecs but I believe that they have tonnes of anti-pick notches so I assume that's one of the security enhancements that they made - I wasn't aware that any of the Abloy systems were pickable without a specialised pick but I've now heard a couple of people mentioning these being picked so it's cool if Abloy were responding to real security threats to the system rather than simply patent extensions.

Edit: Looking over my disks again, would the masterkeying be in the multiple deep-depth notches on the outer side of some disks? Since there are multiple places the key could turn the disk to and still have the sidebar fall in. Just thinking aloud.
<<

huxleypig

User avatar

The Prestigious and Powerful Porcine Prelate

Posts: 954

Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:59 am

Location: West Mids, UK

Post Thu Apr 21, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Yes, you are right about the master-keying, the multiple gates indicate that.

The profile looks different to other 656's that I've seen, all of the others have very 'right bump profile' group. I have seen more extreme cases of the right-bump group profile (not in 656's) but never seen a 656 that is almost centre-bump group profile. If that makes any sense whatsoever?!

The anti-pick discs I am talking about are the ones with the extra semi-circle cut out in the middle of them. Like this:

Image

They are to prevent any tool from working that DOESN'T have a full (or almost full) profile. Without the anti-pick discs then it becomes feasible to make a tool that rotates entirely within the 90 degrees of available arc. I believe that this how the Vempele worked. I don't know if the anti-pick discs existed prior to the Vempele but I know for certain that Abloy made the front discs free-spinning as a direct consequence of the tool. It prevented tensioning from the front disc any more.

The false notches you mention are present on most of the disks. Curiously, I have never seen any on the 0/5 discs though. That goes for the Classic and the High Profile. It helps with picking; if you can only feel 1 gate then you know it is a 0 or a 5. Unless you have some contradictory examples there? I can't work out why this might be the case though. Seems trivial to add false gates to the 0/5 discs if you already do it to the 1/4 and 3's.

I picked my double-Abloy padlock thing the other day! It took 2 picks but was much, much easier than a proper Abloy. Cool lock design though.
<<

LocksportSouth

User avatar

Active Member

Posts: 369

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:51 pm

Location: UK

Post Thu Apr 21, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Ah yeah, I think I get what you mean by right-bump or centre-bump - the position of the inner bump on the outer Profile disk that dictates where the main cut in the key is, right?

As for the anti-pick disks, I'm trying to get my head around how it works. I don't know a great deal about the working of Abloys - just the basics of how they work plus some info I gleaned from another thread (I think it was on this forum) regarding an Abloy Classic picks and the issues with having two disks at 90 degrees from each other. I dunno what you mean by 0/5 disks though, sorry. I assume that relates to where the cut is relative to the disk's rotation?

Ah, that double-Abloy style - do you mean that "43" bicentric lock? It's a cool padlock, I did suspect that the Abloy-style locks that aren't actually Abloys would be easier to pick, but I assume it takes a totally different way of thinking. Awesome that you got yours open!
<<

huxleypig

User avatar

The Prestigious and Powerful Porcine Prelate

Posts: 954

Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:59 am

Location: West Mids, UK

Post Thu Apr 21, 2016 6:31 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Yes, I broadly group the profiles into 3; left, right and centre bump. It is a gross simplification of the entire family of possible profiles though!

Yes, there are 6 cuts, 0-5. 0 would be uncut and a 5 cut would be no interaction with the key at all (until the sidebar falls into place). The disks are (broadly speaking) reversible. So a 0 can become a 5 if flipped over; a 1 can become a 4 and a 3 is the same if you flip it round. I have yet to see a false gate on the 0/5 disks. By that I mean the shallow grooves that are not deep enough to accommodate the sidebar around the circumference of the disk. Which is in addition to the anti-pick disks that I mention above (of which your 656 has 5).
<<

LocksportSouth

User avatar

Active Member

Posts: 369

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:51 pm

Location: UK

Post Thu Apr 21, 2016 8:13 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

huxleypig wrote:Yes, I broadly group the profiles into 3; left, right and centre bump. It is a gross simplification of the entire family of possible profiles though!

Yes, there are 6 cuts, 0-5. 0 would be uncut and a 5 cut would be no interaction with the key at all (until the sidebar falls into place). The disks are (broadly speaking) reversible. So a 0 can become a 5 if flipped over; a 1 can become a 4 and a 3 is the same if you flip it round. I have yet to see a false gate on the 0/5 disks. By that I mean the shallow grooves that are not deep enough to accommodate the sidebar around the circumference of the disk. Which is in addition to the anti-pick disks that I mention above (of which your 656 has 5).


Ahhh gotcha. Thanks for explaining, it makes a lot of sense now. I did notice when assembling it disk-by-disk that I have at least one where the disk doesn't get moved at all by the key, I guess that's a 5.
<<

LocksportSouth

User avatar

Active Member

Posts: 369

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:51 pm

Location: UK

Post Sat May 07, 2016 3:21 am

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

So, it’s been a little while! But fear not, I have a cool update today.

Mystery box:

Image

There she is!

Image

It’s an Ingersoll. It’s also an S&G. This is a really interesting lock and as soon as I saw it on eBay I had to have it – sadly the seller was asking crazy prices for it so I managed to convince him to accept about half what he wanted. Score! :D

Chronologically, this lock sits, I believe, between my other “Vintage Ingersoll” (the Sub Liquidonics / Miracle Lock one, which I now believe to be a Miracle lock body with an Ingersoll core), and my modern Ingersolls. It’s dated as 1973 (stamped on the body) so pretty old, but it has a few weird crossover things:

1. It’s branded with both Ingersoll AND Sargent & Greenleaf, strengthening my conclusion that they seem to have had a period of crossover / co-operation is lock design and manufacture as I’ve seen this before in both body style and branding – I’m not sure if Ingersoll agreed to make locks for S&G or vice versa, but this lock is actually branded with both companies which is very cool.

2. The body shape is very similar to the Sargent & Greenleaf 831, so there was clearly some design inspiration there in one direction or another, although of course this Ingersoll uses laminate plates.

3. The key bow has the same style / design as the older Ingersoll core that I have (“Vintage Ingersoll”), however the actual key profile itself is the wiggly, 10-lever version (same as on my new Ingersolls) rather than the squarer 8-lever version on my other old Ingersoll. In other words, the key is a hybrid between the two locks that I have so far.

4. Speaking of key designs, the key for this lock is stamped with the numbers “831 S 832”, as opposed to “021 L 036”. I’m not sure what the numbers/letters on the old one refer to (maybe 021 is the model number for that lock? Not sure what L would be though), but it seems more than a coincidence that the lock that looks very much like the S&G 831 also has 831 stamped on the key. Maybe “S” is for S&G? Does that mean there’s an S&G 832 out there too? My investigations create more questions than answers, sadly.

5. Whilst I’ve seen locks similar to this one elsewhere on the web, I’ve never seen one with this mechanical snap-close on the keyway area before

Anyway – enough hypothesizing for now, we’ll take a look at specific aspects as we strip the lock down. Note: This is going to be a LONG post with a lot of photos as I totally stripped the lock, including the cylinder and cleaned it all up – there’s also a lot of things I want to point out for this one. Let’s get started!

Here’s the aforementioned key:

Image

Image

If you check over my old Ingersoll posts, you can see that the bow shares a strong resemblance with the “Vintage Ingersoll” lock rather than the modern ones, however the key profile is clearly the modern design. Also note the stamped numbering (831 S 832). Mysterious!

Body “Back”. I do love the say the laminate plates look on these Ingersolls:

Image

Close up of the Patent stamp:

Image

Body “Front”. Note that the way the extra-closed shackle housing looks is very similar to the modern Ingersolls, and yet the overall body shape is reminiscent of the S&G 831:

Image

Closeup of the front text:

Image

Note both the Ingersoll and S&G marks, as well as the US stamp (indicating a gov’t or military lock) as well as the date – 1973.

Bottom of the lock:

Image

The bulge on the right obviously hides the fixing screw which will be accessed from inside the shackle hole, holding the bottom plate on. The odd snap-closed (I assume weather resistant?) catch is on the other side, I assume with another screw behind that holding the bottom plate on. Note also that the right hand side sticks out and has a hole, allowing a chain to be attached.

Side on shot of the snap close:

Image

It’s operation is simple – it’s under spring tension, and pulling back on the serrated left side of the rocker allows the whole thing to hinge back and left, exposing the key hole. When I saw this on eBay I assumed that the round, flat closing plate which actually covers the keyway is magnetic, however that is not the case – it’s held down purely with spring tension.

Snap close pulled back to reveal its own operation as well as the keyway. Note that it’s the more modern Ingersoll design (not sure if the Ingersoll keyways have a specific name or code designation?):

Image

While we’re down here, let’s have a look at the underside of the top portion of the body that provides the extra-closed functionality:

Image

Interesting cutting marks on that metal. Seems like maybe those upper portions are cut from a long tube and then welded on?

One side of the lock, showing what looks like two drain holes. This will be important soon!

Image

The other side, with only one drain hole:

Image

Top of the lock:

Image

The style here looks very much like the modern Ingersoll extra-closed, in fact I’d say that there’s little to no difference there. There are –some- similarities to the S&G 831, but honestly I’d attribute that more to just being how extra-closed shackle locks must work rather than anything else.

Note that little round divot thingy there:

Image

I’m not sure if this is a rod that has been pushed in after assembling something or just an artefact from production? Interesting.

Another shot to point out some of the rust that seems to be forming inside the upper shackle protecting area. Hopefully I can find a way to remove this! I like that the edges of all the plates are rounded, too:

Image

Snap-close pulled back and key fully inserted (locked position):

Image

Key rotated to unlocked position:

Image

Unlocked:

Image

Note that despite being an extra-closed shackle padlock, and despite both the “Vintage Ingersoll” and modern XClosed that I have being removable shackle padlocks, this one is actually not removable shackle – kinda. We’ll get to that!

A better look at that rust inside:

Image

Yeesh!
So, time for a breakdown! After shining a light down inside the open shackle hole, I could see that the (I assume) screw at the bottom is severely rusted up, so much that it’s really hard to even see what kind of screw it is. I spent ages fiddling with various hex screwdrivers, as the slot looked very much like a hex, to no avail. I tested some Torx which didn’t seem to work and went back to hex... After quite a while I eventually found that the screws are indeed Torx, size ‘30’. The star edges were so filled up with rust and grime that the nut looked (and acted) like a hex hole instead!

So, with one screw removed, I turn my attention to the other side. The bottom plate clearly isn’t coming off or rotating, and from my other Ingersolls I know that they usually have a screw on both sides. On the XClosed versions usually the shackle comes out completely, but the closed and open versions do not, and in those cases a roll pin is hammered in from the side perpendicular to the shackle. So I start looking for a roll pin / set screw but the body is totally smooth.. Except for those drain holes. Well the bottom drain holes are too far from the shackle so those can’t be it, so I started testing inserting very small screwdrivers – hex, flat, torx – into the upper hole, with no effect. I assume it’s rusted up?

So I keep testing and digging, hampered by the fact that the holes are so tiny, I can’t fit most of my tools – even my smallest tools – inside. Also due to the small hole and lack of other places that connect to this side of the shackle hole, it was nearly impossible to shine a light inside. When I DID manage to get a light in, it looked like a flat head screw? Turns out that’s probably just the laminated plates of the body on the other side of the hole. I looked all over the body again, tried rotating the shackle and bottom plate, nothing.

Strange – these kind of locks are usually disassemblable, right? So I started playing with the shackle, turning it around and seeing where it popped up and where it was held low. Clearly it was being held into the body with something. Through the upper hole, while it’s nearly impossible to see inside when the shackle is clear, when the shackle is lowered you can see the outside of the shackle quite easily because it’s so much closer to the small hole. So I started examining the shackle from the outside, turning and raising/lowering it slowly to try and observe where the cut-out areas are and how the bottom is held on – I was looking for a low cutout and then a sharp return to the regular thickness, to catch on something to stop the shackle coming out. What I found instead was... Strange:

Image

It’s kinda hard to tell in the photo of there are two points at the bottom of the shackle where a small dip/divot exists... Is it a grub screw? Unsure, I started putting screwdrivers and such into the shackle, also rotating it around to see what was going on. Recessed on one side, sticking out on the other...

And then it hit me.

It’s a pin.

I took me pin punch, flipped the shackle around and hammered it back into the shackle, clearing the obstruction and sliding the shackle up...

Image

Boom.

There’s the shackle:

Image

And there’s that pin:

Image

Well, that was an exercise in frustration! But overall, I’m glad they decided to use some weird-ass esoteric fitting on this lock – it kept me on my toes and provided a fun puzzle. I’m glad I managed to figure it out by myself!

Essentially, the shackle has a kind of roll pin embedded into it. When you want to seal the shackle into the body, you just line up one edge with the upper hole in the outside of the body and use a pin punch or something similar to push the pin out a bit. It can’t come out all the way due to the width of the shackle hole but it’ll come out far enough to catch on something in the upper body, stopping the shackle from being removed. In this way it also allows you to use this as a shackle-retaining or removable shackle padlock. Cool stuff!

Moving on then! Let’s take a look at those two grimy screws that I mentioned earlier:

Image

Image

They’re so gummed up, they look like hex screws!

With those removed, we can now remove the bottom plate and the cylinder:

Image

The cylinder and actuator are fixed together. Here’s the module next to the body:

Image

Here you can see the Ingersoll cylinder held to the brass tube with a roll pin, with the actuator at the bottom along with a rubber gasket presumable to keep water from flowing in from the upper part of the lock down into the cylinder:

Image

All parts stripped down so far:

Image

Inside of the bottom plate:

Image

The screw retainers also act to stop the bottom plate from being rotated if just one screw was removed. Everything in this lock is also grimy as heck!

Bottom plate from the side, with snap-close pulled back. It’s pretty thick!

Image

As is the front of the cylinder:

Image

Note also the spring-loaded sidebar flopping around down there.
Actuator end:

Image

I assume that the long ends (slightly cut out) hold the ball bearings back when the lock is closed – as the key turns 90°, they will fall into the wide, flat edges when the lock is unlocked, allowing the shackle to be removed.

Image

All the levers in place:

Image

Down inside the body of the lock:

Image

Note that it looks fairly well lubed in there – well, I actually stripped the lock down to this level once already, to check that it was possible, before re-assembling to do this photoshoot. It was a bit of a nightmare to keep the BBs in place so I loaded them up with a hearty supply of lube, and then lubed their respective holes, to keep them in place while I re-assembled. In actuality, when I first stripped this lock everything was devoid of lube and it’s all really grimy and rusty sadly.

One of the main issues of getting the BBs to stay in is that their respective BB holes are actually not flat against the bottom of the back of the lock body hole, but raised up by something like 5mm, making it impossible to simply roll them into place – you have to kinda lift them up and in with a screwdriver, and of course, as soon as you do one and move on to the other side, the last BB rolls out! Paired with the difficulty of finding the right place for the cylinder to fit so that the sidebar fits, the cylinder can rotate, and the key can be removed (only one one of two possible orientations) and it’s a real pain to assemble this!

Anyway, moving on :).

The ball bearings are smaller than I expected to be honest:

Image

All the stripped parts so far:

Image

This is as far as I got with my first foray into this lock. Everything from here on out is virgin territory!
Since the lock is so grimy, I’ve decided (with the success of stripping the Abloy 656 cylinder behind me) to give total disassembly of this lock a shot! First we need to disconnect the Ingersoll cylinder from the brass cylinder that houses the actuator. To do that we have to punch out a roll pin kinda thing, of course, because this is an Ingersoll lock and nothing says Ingersoll like roll pins :D

Image

There it is!

Image

Two parts separated:

Image

Inside of the back of the brass tube:

Image

It has a cutout for the back of the Ingersoll cylinder – which I assume is usually the actuator (or connects directly to it) in other locks so due to the shortness of the Ingersoll cylinder and the length of this lock, the long brass tube was required to bridge the gap from where the ball bearings sit and the front of the lock. They decided to create a hollow tube to house the (pointless) rear actuator of the cylinder and hold it on with a roll pin rather than make use of the cylinder’s existing fittings.

What I’d love to see is a custom Ingersoll cylinder for this lock that’s the entire length of the lock and connects to the actuator on the end. It’d be, like, 30 levers and have an absurd key but it’d be awesome :D.

Here’s the back of the cylinder as mentioned:

Image

Note the thin disks at the back, I assume to act as washers? It’s also milled out with a slot to interact directly with an actuator.

I forgot to photo this directly, but on the back of the cylinder there are a couple more pins / roll pins pushed in that hold various things in place. One of these stabilises and acts as a hinge point for the levers, so we need to remove this to disassemble the cylinder. Unfortunately the pin is pushed in with no way to access the other end (since the front plate of the lock is smooth and welded directly to this cylinder), but luckily it’s easy to nudge out with a small tool and from there just grab it with pliers:

Image

Image

The disks are looser now and can be slid around to the other side of the cylinder:

Image

Image

Unfortunately despite trying, the disks can’t be removed with the sidebar contraption in the way, as that’s where they need to come out. I didn’t really want to remove this because it looks like the spring has been loaded onto the bar under tension, but that seems not to be the case after all thankfully.

Sidebar, spring and it’s retaining pin:

Image

Other side of the sidebar:

Image

All the little bits:

Image

“Open” side of the cylinder with levers in:

Image

Removed the two fine disks from the back of the cylinder:

Image

To remove a lever, push the rounded nub down as far as it can go (note the gap on the far right):

Image

And then flip over the cylinder to see the lever sticking out:

Image

You can then remove it:

Image

Don’t lose the order of the disks!
Note that every other disk comes out the other way round – i.e. you slide it in the opposite direction and it’ll come out of the “back” of the cylinder the other way round. I assume this is one lever for each side of the key. Carefully slide them all out and line them up:

Image

Closeup of a lever so you can see how the spring is fitted:

Image

I’ve still not yet worked out how these actually work. The square “true gates” (though there are no false gates) on the right hand side of this lever (alternately left and right) is where the sidebar slots into, on the back of the cylinder, when the lever is rotated correctly. When all the gates line up, the sidebar can be pushed into the gap (under spring tension) and the rotational pressure of the key will turn this entire cylinder within the lock body, in turn rotating the actuator. The spring which hangs down from the lever pushes the lever back up into its natural position when the key is not present, “scrambling” the lever combination when the key is removed (without that, the levers would stay in place, allowing the cylinder to be rotated without the proper key).

The round hole is where the metal rod goes through, and acts as a hinge point allowing the levers to rotate around that point. I assume the key fits between the large cutout in the lever, and the cut in the key rotated the lever to a specific position. The “gates” in the levers are cut at different positions, so when the correct key is entered the lever will be rotated to the correct position for the gates to line up. However I’m not 100% sure that this is how it works and is only speculation on my part. Small wear scratches on the disks (you can just about see them on the last photo – directly at the bottom of the large cutout in a semi-circular fashion) indicate (I assume) where the key interacts with the lever.

Cylinder emptied (levers removed) – this is the “closed” / front side, note that the silver disks go all the way around:

Image

The back edge of the levers (where the spring connects) bump up against the bottom silver metal pieces here.

“Back” side of the cylinder – the silver disks have large cutouts in them:

Image

This is the side where the levers are removed.
Back edge from an angle (you can see where the pin goes through, which holds the sidebar unit in place, allowing it to pivot down into the hole between the big silver disks and interact with the gates on the levers):

Image

Front edge of the cylinder from an angle. You can see where the pin goes through, holding the levers in place and causing them to pivot here:

Image

All the parts, totally stripped down (as much as possible):

Image

Here we have the shackle, two bottom plate retaining screws, bottom plate, actuator cylinder, small section includes rod to hold cylinder to actuator (top left), rod to hold levers in place on which they pivot (bottom left), sidebar, sidebar spring and rod to hold that in place. Empty cylinder, two ball bearings for the locking mechanism, key, body, levers and two spacer / washer disks.

Next up is the good ol’ soak in GUNK. I forgot to get any photos of this stage, but basically I put all the small pieces (everything but the body and levers/two spacer disks) in my usual small pot of GUNK, and filled up a bigger container to house the lock body. I didn’t want to get the levers mixed up (not as easy to fix as pins since I don’t really understand how the mechanism works yet) so I kept those out and cleaned each one individually with WD-40 as best I could.

Levers cleaned (not great I know – most of that black stuff won’t come off, wonder if it’s rust or something?):

Image

As of this time of writing the other lock stuff is still chillin’ in GUNK, so I’ll fill in the rest of this when it’s all cleaned up!

....

Alrighty! Picking up where we left off. Here’s a box of freshly GUNK’d bits:

Image

I started off cleaning the lock body, which unfortunately is very rusted inside. The screw holes are nearly impossible to get into with a cloth, even loaded onto a hex screwdriver (my fave trick for dealing with these). Rusty brown crap just keeps coming off and off – I’m not sure if it’s even possible to completely clean the inside of this body, but here’s how the cloth looked by the end of it:

Image

That’s just one side.
Eventually I decided it was time to move onto the other parts. Discolouration tended to stay and some stuff was just too rusty to get clean but I’m overall happy with how it turned out :).

Now it’s time to re-assemble. Levers are loaded back into the plug in the same way that they came out:

Image

I realised pretty quickly that you want to load the pivoting rod in as you go, since they’re hard to align properly and easier to do one at a time:

Image

All the levers loaded back in:

Image

Back of the cylinder (I remembered that I forgot to photo this before):

Image

Still looks a little scrappy but then it is an old lock! You can see the “filled” rod hole to pivot the levers, and the empty hole where the sidebar goes.

With the key in, all the gates line up:

Image

Sidebar loaded back on:

Image

Thankfully the spring wasn’t too hard to get back in place!

Testing the sidebar... And it works!

Image

Cylinder re-attached to brass plug with roll pin:

Image

The nuts look much better now:

Image

Oh, and it turns out that they actually *are* hex nuts, not torx. Turns out that even with my fairly big set of long hex screwdrivers, I don’t have one the right size to fit this particular nut. I do have a bigger range of “regular” L-shape hex keys but they’re too short to fit into the shackle hole. Thankfully I had a Torx driver which was the right size and happened to operate the screw – otherwise this would be a MUCH shorter post, hah!

With the cylinder re-fitted and screws back in, it’s time to punch out the pin in the shackle again to lock the shackle inside the lock body. This turned out to be a bit harder than anticipated as the pin just –did not- want to move. Luckily we got there in the end! I managed to get a couple of photos, too. Here’s the sticking-out end – if you move the shackle around you can get it to stick out into the body hole:

Image

You can just about see the recessed side here:

Image

Still pretty rusty inside the lock:

Image

I’ve ordered some rust remover from Amazon (I think it’s called Jenolite) so we’ll see if I get any luck with that! In terms of lube, I used Tri-flow on the cylinder (zipping the key in and out to work it through) and Lithium grease paste on the bigger parts – ball bearings, actuator, shackle depressions etc.

Re-assembled:

Image

It does feel much nicer to operate now, especially the key which inserts much more smoothly and the cylinder turns more smoothly too. An overall success, I think!

Looking forward to adding it to the “wall of fame” :D.
<<

jasminelognnes

User avatar

Familiar Face

Posts: 24

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 6:51 am

Location: Denmark

Post Wed May 11, 2016 1:34 am

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Are there good reasons to make locks out of laminated plates?

Does it make them stronger or cheaper to make? Or something else?
<<

GWiens2001

User avatar

Lock-Goblin-Gordon
Lock-Goblin-Gordon

Posts: 3795

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:05 pm

Location: Arizona, United States

Post Wed May 11, 2016 5:39 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Done properly, they can be stronger and cheaper. Done poorly, then they are just cheaper.

Many/most of the laminated plates are stamped out of a roll of steel. Therefore there is less waste metal and cheaper tooling than milling out solid lock bodies.

Gordon
Just when you think you've learned it all, that is when you find you haven't learned anything yet.
<<

LocksportSouth

User avatar

Active Member

Posts: 369

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:51 pm

Location: UK

Post Sun May 15, 2016 12:12 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Edit: Oops, didn't see those replied before posting! Due to not receiving email notification. Thanks for chiming in Gordon - I had no real idea, just assumed it was easier to make lots of thin sheets cut to a specific size "2D" than one "3D" lock, kinda like 3D-printing.


Aaand I’m one step closer to completing my S&G collection :D.

Up today we have the Sargent and Greenleaf 826C:

Image

As I already have the 826A and 826D, this effectively completes the collection (I don’t think there was an 826B but I could be wrong, also there are other variants such as (I believe) a thin-shackle 826C and prototype models) of 826* S&G locks. As shown in This video (not mine), the 826A has a slimmer body and shackle, the 826C has a slimmer body (same as 826A) but a thicker shackle (same as 826D), and the 826D has a thicker shackle and body.

I’ve actually ended up with three of these – basically I saw an offer on eBay for two of them and jumped at it since there were no other 826s for sale at that time. Then a few days later, I saw another one come up that I preferred so I ordered that one too :). The other two are up for sale, BTW!

This lock came with two keys, both operator’s keys and we’ll get to that later. You can see that this lock is dated 1975 and is also stamped with the number “009”, I assume a UID for wherever these were used. I don’t have the chain that would have come with these, nor the instructions or box – I’d imagine it’s very rare to find those these days though, especially with a lock from the 70s!

A closer look at the ‘front’ of the body:

Image

It’s in pretty good condition for such an old lock!

Top/shackle area:

Image

You may recall from my other 826 posts that the cut-out shape which intersects with the shackle here is the top plate which is the first step in disassembling the lock.

Side of the lock where the top plate slides out, and the drain hole:

Image

Fun fact! Whilst both sides of the lock have a drain hole at the bottom, that’s not all that it’s for. Whilst in the past (with previous 826s) I’ve just assumed that the shackle cannot be removed from the body at all, after my foray into the weird with that Ingersoll / S&G 831 lock that I previously stripped, I started getting more inquisitive and investigated the end of the shackle in this 826. Turns out that it’s held in place by the same “roll pin in the shackle top” method which is hammered out through the hole in the bottom of the shackle-retaining side. You only need to do this if there’s an issue with the shackle, but it’s good to know!

Here’s the back side with the patent info stamp. Nice and clear!

Image

And here’s the other side with the chain loop:

Image

And the bottom – same cutout as the other 826s and 831, supporting operator (open lock, clockwise) and control (restricted to operator’s key, strip lock, counter-clockwise) operations:

Image

Here’s the key – you can tell that it’s an operator’s key because of the little square nub opposite the shoulder near the bow:

Image

Other side of the keys:

Image

Key inserted:

Image

Lock unlocked:

Image

Now, I mentioned that this lock only came with two operator’s keys. I believe that, as with any Medeco / S&G lock, these would originally have come with two operator keys (round bow) and one control key (square bow). However, I’ve only ever seen 826s with round head keys (one or two). In this lock’s case, I got it with two operator’s keys. Luckily, you can turn an operator key into a control key – you just have to file away that nub, and part of the shoulder on the opposite side. Compare these two:

Image

Both keys came to me looking like the one on the left (operator). I filed the left one down to be a control key, which can both open and strip the lock. Lucky they made it this way round and not requiring the nubs to be a control key!

With the newly-modified control key inserted, we can turn CCW:

Image

You then strip the lock by unlocking the shackle and sliding the retaining plate on the top of the lock out horizontally:

Image

Here’s the top plate / retaining plate / whatever you want to call it:

Image

Note the grooves on the side, just like previous 826s I’ve stripped, which allows it to slot neatly into the side of the lock – I assume this also gives it good resistance to having shim-like objects inserted into the lock body to attempt bypass.

The underside of said plate:

Image

The groove on the left hand side interacts with a nub on the top of the actuator and is what prevents the plate from sliding out when the lock is locked or turned to operator (rather than control) position. In the locked position, the nub on the actuator will sit roughly in the middle of that cut-out well (but remember that when locked, the shackle is also holding this plate in). When in the “normal” open position, as the key is turned clockwise, the nub will be pushed to the far (upper, in this case) end of the cutout. As there is no groove out of the recess, the plate is prevented from removing. When the key is turned to the control position, the nub will end up aligned with the “exit” slot (at the bottom in this pic), which will allow the plate to be slid out.

Note that filing the nub off of the top of the actuator, or filing another groove at the other end of the top plate recess, would both allow the lock to be always disassembled, as well as filing down the key as described.

Inside the lock with the top plate removed:

Image

Note in the top-left of the open area, you can see the little nub on the top of the actuator arm as previously discussed.

The actuator itself, with the nub on the right hand side:

Image

Note that with the 826 and 831 locks, the actuator actually doubles as the locking bar rather than utilising ball bearings as per the other S&G locks. The bar directly sits on top of the cylinder, and as you turn the key, you rotate this bar which fit into (or comes out of) the two recesses in the shackle.

Underside of the locking bar / actuator:

Image

The round cutout is where the very back of the Medeco cylinder sits, and the two raised edges around that area keep the cylinder from slipping out and are the means by which the cylinder can rotate the bar. Note that one of the main differences with the classic Medeco used in the 826/831, and the BiAxial used in the 833 and onwards, is that with the later cylinder, the back of the plug is almost entirely round (except for a small squared off area, which is how those cylinders actuate the actuator attached) whereas on these old cylinders it’s cut down to a rectangular shape to fit into the dimensions shown in this locking bar – I’ll point that out when we get to it. This does mean that you can file down a BiAxial* cylinder to fit into a Classic* cylinder-taking lock, if you so desire – i.e. fit an 833 core in an 831, etc.

* Note that I’m not sure if the difference between the round-back and oblong-back cylinders is as simple as “BiAxial and “Classic” – I know that those two cylinders have other differences (such as the positioning of the alignment lugs on the pins, and other security features) so it’s more than likely two separate things – the technology of Classic and BiAxial (and M3), and on the other hand Medeco cylinders designed either for the older actuator style (S&G 831 and 826 for example) and the newer design (833 and 951 etc). However if you can confirm this one way or the other, do let me know!

Also as an addendum to the above, I’d love to know where the 844 fits in this. If you own an 844, I’d love to see a breakdown or let me know whether this uses the slot-out piece and locking bar / actuator design of the 831 and earlier, or the split-body design of the 833 and later, and also whether it takes round-back or oblong-back Medeco cylinders and whether they are Classic or BiAxial. For science!


Inside of the body with the cylinder and gubbins removed. The hole which accepts the shackle is at the bottom, next to the stamped number “6” which I assume is part of a technique to help foil those who would destroy and replace the lock. Note also (I’ve probably mentioned it before) that unlike the newer S&G locks (833 and beyond), the 826 and 831 do not use an anti-drill plate between the cylinder bottom and the bottom of the lock – it sits directly on the bottom of the lock metal (again, if you have an 844 I’d love to know where it stands in this regard!)

Image

Here’s the cylinder. Or, at least, *a* cylinder. I was also photographing the two spare 826s that I have and did switch some parts around so some of the following pics might be a mish-mash, but they all contribute to make up one lock, one way or the other :)

Image

Here, on the back of the cylinder, you can see the rectangular shape of the back of the plug that I mentioned. Take another look at the underside of the actuator / locking bar and you can imagine how it sits onto the actuator at the back of the plug:

Image

Time to strip and clean the cylinder! Remove the C-clip (E-clip?):

Image

Remove the plug with a plug follower. Extract the sidebar:

Image

The plug is a bit rusty:

Image

Here you can see the pins in the plug:

Image

On the pins, the little gaps / cut-outs facing in the 6 o’clock position (straight down) are the gates in the pins that allow the sidebar legs to fall in when rotated to the correct orientation. Note that with the key inserted, they are all facing directly downwards towards the sidebar cutout. The little cutout in the plug between the 1 o’clock and 4 o’clock position (roughly) is the rotational scope of the pin, and the nub in the side of the pins at the varying positions facing right/east is what holds the pin within the boundaries of the cutout on the right of each pin chamber. The angled grooves in the key automatically rotate the pins, within the scope set by the window of the right-hand side plug cutouts, to the correct position (directly down / 6 o’clock).

Fun fact: If your Medeco cylinder has the two sets of cut-outs in the pin (sidebar gate and rotational blocking notch) at approx 90° from each other as in this photo, then you have a Medeco Classic. If however the two sets of cut-outs are 180° from each other (i.e. the sidebar notch on one side of the pin, and the rotational blocking nubs and matching plug cutouts on the opposite side of the pin, i.e. 6 o’clock and 12 o’clock) then you have a Medeco BiAxial (or M3 possibly? I’m not sure if you can tell the diff at this point though there are other differences between those two).

A series of Medeco pins showing both sidebar grooves and orientation nubs:

Image

Empty plug and key:

Image

Driver pins and springs removed:

Image

All the lock parts spread out:

Image

I decided to try out my new purchase of jenolite and try treating the rust in this core prior to re-assembly. Good news – it worked well! Less good news – Who knew that these plugs are actually made of brass with a steel-looking coating?

Image

Oops.
Cylinder re-assembled:

Image

Lock re-assembled:

Image

It’s now up on my display board! I’ll have to get an updated photo of that soon.

Thanks for reading! :).
<<

DroppedTensionWrench

Active Member

Posts: 275

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:15 pm

Location: Arizona

Post Mon May 16, 2016 7:44 pm

Re: LocksportSouth's Stash

Haven't browsed this thread in a while. AWESOME collection good sir!
PreviousNext

Return to Your Lock Collections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Don't forget to visit our sponsors for all of your lockpicking needs!
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Grop
"CA Black" theme designed by stsoftware